To the Editor:
Unfortunately, a man was recently executed in a gruesome way via high voltage wires. This was a terrible accident, and could have been prevented with more training, as one should never grab on to more than one wire at once. While grabbing onto a while can be a natural reaction in a situation where one is being shocked, this action can have fatal results. Additionally, had he followed proper safety procedures that include insulating gloves and boots, this accident likely wouldn’t have happened.
However, even with this accident and more that will inevitably follow, as with any new technology, there is no reason whatsoever to ban AC or high voltage systems. Accidents happen in every industry; this is unavoidable and a cost of developing new and better technologies. Over 100 people were killed last year in vehicular accidents, yet the death of someone due to these accidents doesn’t invoke nearly the same outcry. People have accepted that vehicles have a risk, and the same is true for electricity. In both cases, the benefits outweigh the potential risk, and there has been no convincing argument as to why high voltage transmission lines should be banned.
-Lord Fairfax
Edison: P. 625-635
http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0149-75
— Investment costs as a reason why high voltage is used
— Suggests that more plants be built if low voltage DC isn’t enough to supply the outskirts
— Claims that AC plants are built on the outskirts where land is cheap and need to use high voltages to push the power into the city
—- Efficient use of land
— Edison suggests that DC be limited to 600 or 700 volts; does not provide an AC range as it’s unsafe no matter what
— Edison strongly against AC
Westinghouse: P. 653-665
http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/moa-cgi?notisid=ABQ7578-0149-80
Useful Pages in Jonnes: