Edison is known for his expertise in electricity. One of the smartest men, a veteran in this particaular field. Edison invented a workable incandescent light bulb and a whole electrical power system using direct current. Do I know if the death of Lineman’s was delieberately supported by Edison so that to publics thought of using alternating current would change for the worse? Was he really trying to scare peopleand concluding that his testing on animals using altenating current? Is he out to seek revenge and sabbotage Westinghouse’s new form of electricity? Or does Edison strongly believe that alternating current is harmful and that Lineman death is a result of using Westinghouse’s electrical power system? Maybe altenating current is much worse than direct current but how are we to know for a fact. Lineman’s death is not vaild proof until there is proof that direct current, given in the same situation that lineman was in, could kill him. Maybe electricity in general is harmful. Maybe electricity was not the solution to gas lgihting or candles. Maybe electricity is just as dangerous and previous alternate means. I think we need more proof before we job into conclusion. We need to have a full investigation of the incident.
~Madame Questionnaire